Why Pauline and I Have Chosen Not to Take the C19 Vaccines: [My] Defence Beforehand.

 

[I realise many friends and family are confused about why Pauline and I are unvaccinated; on a first look it would appear irrational. I hope this goes some way towards explaining why. None of the below is meant to influence anything you do, none of this is advice in anyway at all: we all make our own way through this; albeit pity about the ruthless coercion falling on we unvaccinated by Ardern’s government and the hysteria they have deliberately created around the unvaccinated, and in some places in the below a little bitterness has reared its head (sorry). It is what it is. If nothing else, if you get bored on the way through, make sure you read Addendum 1 on what 95% vaccine efficacy means: it’s an eye-opener.

 Note, until December 2015 I kept an old blog Life Behind the IRon Drape - this post is irrevocably founded in the classical liberal philosophy of that old blog. Nevertheless I've decided to keep this post separate and as a stand-alone: there will be no other posts here.

All the best, Mark Hubbard. 5 December, 2021 – this is written over several weeks. If you want to follow me on Twitter my handle is @MarkHubbard33. Well, until I get banned.]

 

My wife, Pauline, is immune compromised yet refuses to have the spike protein – the dangerous part of both Covid 19 (C19) and the vaccines - created in her bloodstream or body by Pfizer, or another of the pharmaceutical companies. I have asked her – at least originally, not any more - to please consider taking the vaccine, as short term defence – any sort of defence – from Covid for her is more important than other considerations, but she will not: after a length of time, and some ‘debate’, I have to respect that. I note Pauline’s view is not without science – there is evidence some categories of autoimmune people suffer severe adverse reactions to Pfizer, indeed, Professor Warren Tate of the University of Otago has written to Ardern’s government requesting they be given exemptions from vaccination, although this is a brute ideologue of a government so we know no such exemption will be granted (1).  Furthermore, Pauline’s decision is also informed by a philosophical hatred of and a refusal to acquiesce to the destruction of civil liberties and bullying that governments like ours have justified in their policies around C19, to the imposition of what is frankly a recognisable authoritarian police state in the powers that have been assumed under emergency by the government, and the current deliberate vilification and from December 3, 2021, forced exclusion, of the unvaccinated from much of society under the Traffic Lights policy.

 

So, vaccinated or not, she knows C19 will be a major issue for her, sadly, potentially terminal – but so is any infection, flu or even a cold; she was hospitalised just one month ago with an infection you or I would have fought off unnoticed. Given this, our best approach, logically our only approach, is thus to try and dodge C19 for as long as we can in the Marlborough Sounds.

 

Considering my own position, the official argument is I should vaccinate to protect Pauline. I have called this post ‘my defence’ because I have a foreboding of my future, as I don’t agree with that for two reasons:

 

a) Given that transmission of C19 from person to person is little or not affected at all by being vaccinated - I realise that is neither Pfizer nor the government’s position but research proves otherwise - this would not stop me getting C19 or passing it on; there are now numerous studies verifying this point as incontrovertible, the most notable published in Medrxiv showing essentially equal transmission within households between unvaccinated and vaccinated (2). Paraphrased, note especially the underlined below, which leads to my more important point (b) following:

 

‘What did they find?  High viral load in “158 of 232 unvaccinated (68%...) and 156 of 225 fully vaccinated (69%...) symptomatic individuals.”  Meaning there was effectively no difference between the symptomatic vaccinated and unvaccinated in terms of who was carrying, and therefore spreading, the virus. 

 

But the study does not end there.  It also found high viral loads in “7 of 24 unvaccinated (29%...) and 9 of 11 fully vaccinated asymptomatic individuals (82%...).” Meaning, among asymptomatic individuals, the vaccinated had a higher percentage with a high viral load.  As I explained in [snip], this reflects that the unvaccinated that catch the virus are more likely to be at home in bed with symptoms, while the vaccinated that catch the virus are more likely to have no symptoms and hence continue their daily routine unknowingly spreading the virus.’ 

 

Note Pfizer never claimed its vaccine stopped transmission and there were no trials done on this; the stopping transmission line, until the wheels fell off on the data, was solely from the politicians desperate to make you vaccinate. They still continue with this lie, despite reality. Think about that; if they lied to you on transmission, what else are they capable of lying about?

 

b) My second reason for not vaccinating vis a vis Pauline’s protection is already noted in the underlined sentence above, but moreover, the point is enforced by an Israeli airport study (3) - Israel being one of the most vaccinated countries in the world – that myself being vaccinated will arguably put Pauline in a more vulnerable position, as the vaccine will ameliorate my symptoms either wholly, or for days when I will be contagious: unvaccinated my symptoms will develop much quicker so, for example, waking with an itchy throat, etc, can be the canary in the mine to get myself out of the house and tested (pity Ardern’s government at the time of writing this still does not allow us to buy our own rapid-gen testing kits (why?). To quote that Israeli study, published, November 2021, and note the first part of the sentence well, not just what I have underlined:

 

‘… This also implies that the absolute number of infected individuals in the Vaccinated group is likely to be at least as high as in the Unvaccinated, raising serious concerns that the new Green Pass [Israel’s Covid Passport] is inefficient in preventing infection spread, and could expose high risk individuals to risk.’ (2)

 

On this evidence it is unsurprising that coming into the Northern Hemisphere winter it is the most highly vaccinated countries which are showing the greatest surges in cases, such as Ireland which at over 98% vaccinated is reintroducing lockdown measures, indeed, the small nation of Gibraltar which has a 118% vaccination rate – higher than 100% because they count the foreign nationals from Spain who work there – that’s every single adult in the nation is vaccinated, however, due to their biggest surge in cases they are locking down the population completely for Christmas. That makes sense in light of what we now know about transmission, noting under the Traffic Lights policy in New Zealand those C19 vaccinated super spreaders are about to be released to travel around the country (which I support: we have to live with C19, but that’s outside my point here). [Postscript: with many northern hemisphere countries now locking down for Christmas to stave off the mild Omicron - for  example, Netherlands, UK - perhaps something worse is going on in the highly vaccinated countries: I return to this aspect later under immunology.]

 

So, the reverse to the current demonisation of the unvaccinated by governments, it is the vaccinated, especially the asymptomatic carriers, who are the super-spreaders of C19, and it is the vaccinated who are the threat to the unvaccinated: however, we unvaccinated are happy to manage that risk with whether we put ourselves in crowds, or not, and speaking for Pauline and I, we will never be fearful of the vaccinated, our friends or family, nor would we ever treat other human beings as sub-human which this government – looking at you Stuart Nash – is hysterically promoting in a manner that is both reckless and immoral for the unvaccinated.

 

Since writing the above paragraph, more relevant research is now published, albeit I understand not peer reviewed at this stage (4): just to reinforce this point there is no difference in transmission – that’s no difference at all – between the vaccinated and unvaccinated; pursuant to the latest study of a C19 outbreak in a US federal prison over August of 2021, the researchers conclude, quote:

 

‘As this field continues to develop, clinicians and public health practitioners should consider vaccinated persons who become infected with SARS-CoV-2 to be no less infectious than unvaccinated persons. These findings are critically important, especially in congregate settings where viral transmission can lead to large outbreaks.’

 

A point I will return to later, but note how nonsensical employer mandates and C19 passports, lack of which will soon see Pauline and I banned from civil society and the ability to live normal human lives, are in light of the facts about transmission of C19. Mandates and passports/passes which only concern transmission of C19, are obviously not about the medical science, on the facts the company of Pauline and I is no greater risk to the vaccinated than being around other vaccinated, indeed, it’s less when you factor in the asymptomatic vaccinated super-spreaders, so why are Ardern’s government and governments around the world being so brutal and intransigent against we unvaccinated in the implementation and enforcement of identity paper based regimes that allow some to go about their lives while excluding others such as ourselves? Is it to bring in a universal identity passport/papers system that will remain for all our lives and end up as with the social credit scoring system in China where your life is owned by the state completely? Even a month ago I would have said that was fanciful conspiracy nonsense, but at this stage it’s hard to believe not; I’m feeling owned right now, I am penalised for exercising a choice over my body that harms no one. More mundanely, if you need to avoid getting C19, because you have comorbidities and are vulnerable, then don’t be deluded by the government’s or that cultish jabbing fanatic Professor Rod Jackson’s promise Pfizer will protect you from getting it and you can socialise as normal with the vaccinated, they are misinforming you, they are saying that to get you to vaccinate, but which in this case is therefore dangerous. If you need to avoid C19, I’m sorry, but you have to avoid the vaccinated every bit as much as the unvaccinated. And my not being vaccinated, on the actual real world data, makes no difference to Pauline’s safety.

 

Moving on from the protection of Pauline, for myself, I have then chosen to not wilfully create the spike protein in my bloodstream or body, either, by taking Pfizer (or any of the C19 vaccines as they currently exist in very poorly designed form) for the following reasons.

 

The C19 vaccines are not safe for everybody, fact; in medicine there should never be a one size fits all approach imposed by governments nor should politicians have ever entered into the deliberate destruction of the doctor/patient relationship, and the muzzling of doctors who have differing opinions on the C19 vaccines, for the scientific process is, at it's simplest, questioning and re-questioning based on changing data, and outside of that, the pity is C19 is best simply treated in the first seven days of infection with a known cocktail of drugs as promoted and practiced by some few of the doctors in the US and in Europe whose papers and writings are cancelled and silenced by the government/Pfizer/media narrative, along with their early treatments – sic California’s Dr. Tyson who in his three emergency clinics has treated over 6,000 Covid victims, not one mortality, and yes, his early treatments include Ivermectin as one, only, component (even though an anti-parasitical, it works by decreasing the C19 viral load – but trying to justify that is a whole other post, which is not my concern). In New Zealand the two main constituents of these early treatments are banned by Ardern’s government, we have tried twice to import them, both times confiscated by NZ Customs, so we are stuck with the vitamin regime: vitamins D3, K2, C, plus Zinc and Magnesium. We are not allowed to be responsible for ourselves as we see fit. Worse, when C19 positive people are put into isolation in New Zealand incredibly they are given no treatment other than a throat lozenge, Panadol and an Oxypulse-meter: whereas all viruses should be treated early, and there are treatments, so what is going on here? Whatever the reason is, it’s a negligent and potentially murderous policy, noting that two people have now died in isolation. [Does Ardern’s government contract with Pfizer ban early treatments to make our only recourse to that company’s poorly designed vaccine? It’s hard not to fall down that particular rabbit hole.] Around the world and in New Zealand many are killed by the vaccines, many have had life changing, long term adverse effects from the vaccines: however, unfortunately, while C19 deaths are deliberately overstated - one of New Zealand’s latest Delta deaths laughingly died by gunshot - vaccine deaths are conversely treated as ‘coincidental’ to recently having been inoculated and rarely reported; albeit they are becoming too numerous to be ‘disappeared’ entirely, and that information is slowly getting out via the VAERS databases in US (CARM in New Zealand, a database that Medsafe should have made for mandatory reporting of adverse events, but is only voluntary, noting that even Medsafe estimates in its Guide to Adverse Reaction Reporting that only 5% of adverse events are recorded). In New Zealand Dr. Guy Hatchard has written a pertinent open letter to Jacinda Ardern on the distorted way that C19 deaths are reported compared to the near non-reporting of vaccine adverse reactions and deaths (5)

 

‘The policy of recording Covid on the death certificate irrespective of the comorbidities can be consistently applied and has its own logic. However the method of recording adverse effects of Covid vaccines is applied distinctly differently and in an opposite way. When a vaccine adverse effect is reported, the policy is to search for possible confounding morbidities, if one can be found then it is judged that the vaccine is not responsible. It is also not a policy to examine all deaths and adverse events for a whole month after vaccination, thus in addition many possible adverse effects are being omitted.

It is well known that vaccines including Covid vaccines are vectors (or triggers) which can and do exacerbate a large number of comorbidities. Thus, taking a specific example, Covid vaccines are known to be associated with thrombosis, but this association is dismissed as causative because it predominantly occurs among people who already are known to be at risk of stroke. For example, a small number of people taking the contraceptive pill are known to be at risk of thrombosis. Should such a person die after receiving the vaccination as happened recently in New Zealand, the cause of death is ascribed to the contraceptive pill. This is an excessively conservative and misleading approach.

Since the reporting methodologies of Covid severity and death versus vaccination adverse effects are divergent, conclusions drawn from these two sets of data are unsound. The distortion these two differing methodologies of reporting produce turns out to be significant in terms of public policy. Apples are being compared to oranges. Whilst Covid deaths appear inflated, vaccine adverse effects are greatly reduced to the extent that they appear to be virtually non-existent. This is not the case. As you [Jacinda Ardern] are aware from your recent post on your Facebook page about vaccine side effects, which garnered 33,000 comments [until comments were turned off], vaccine side effects are highly unreported by the government agency but are not going unnoticed by a significant cohort of the public.’

 

Furthermore, not only are the C19 vaccines not safe for all, but per the sixth link in the reference section at end of this post (6), our natural immunity to C19 is already very high, namely, overall a 99.7% survival rate (different between age groups, worse as you get older, and way worse if you have comorbidities, especially obesity, or are immune compromised). My individual probability of surviving C19 is 99.9887% [per Oxford University C19 calculator], my chance of being hospitalised is merely 0.67%. On the other hand, Pfizer’s poorly designed, leaky, transient vaccine that lasts six months or perhaps less, has unknown long term effects in humans because there is no long term trial data, that whole process of safely bringing a vaccine to market was short-cut under emergency powers by governments, meaning the world population is now the long term trial that wasn’t supposed to end, re Pfizer’s vaccine, until April 2023. And there’s something further here that deserves its own paragraph.

 

In America they still have a written constitution protecting their rights, yes it’s being attacked more than perhaps ever in the USA’s history, but there is still due process, there is still a truly independent judiciary, and there is still a principled free press, unlike in New Zealand where Ardern’s government seem able to shut down any information they like, and they are particularly able to do this because our mainstream media is complicit with them in doing so: our media cynically call it responsible journalism: I don’t call it journalism at all. So, in America 30 professors and scientists calling themselves the Public Health and Medical Professionals for Transparency group filed an FOIA (equivalent of our official information requests) with the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for all data, including safety data, that factored into that agency’s decision to authorize Pfizer’s vaccine for emergency use, as it is rolled out in New Zealand. It is significant that the FDA initially refused to comply - in New Zealand it would have ended here - so the group took them to court and won. However, there’s a huge qualification to that win: what they won from the federal judge was only the right to receive the information from FDA heavily redacted and at the rate of 500 pages per month: this means it will take until the year 2076, that’s 55 years, to receive all the information as to the safety of the Pfizer vaccine. That leads my mind to certain conclusions: such a lack of transparency on behalf of FDA tells me it’s information they don’t want us to know. How else can you reasonably interpret it? This is particularly so now the first information under this request has been released, being a Pfizer document called the Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorisation Adverse Events Records Reports: that is, data on adverse reactions to their vaccine. That document shows that just over the initial 90 day period of the vaccines rollout from 1 December 2020 to 28 February 2021, there were 42,086 adverse reactions recorded. The breakdown of that is 1,223 deaths, 19,582 people recovered or recovering, 11,361 still not recovered at the time of the report, and the balance unknown (which is over 9,000 people). The greatest number of adverse reactions was in the 31 to 50 year age group. Those sound like big numbers to me, especially the deaths and not recovered yet, but are they, or are they a statistical blip? We need context, but it will take 55 years to get that context, all of which is far too late: the world needs that information now, the fact we are not going to have this safety data for beyond our lifetimes, most of us, the fact that governments are not only not demanding it, they are suppressing it, is first, criminal, in my opinion, but also stupid, because in absence of that data, in the attempts to hide that data from us, I’m assuming the worse, and that these figures are going to be alarming as to the safety of a vaccine that is being mandatorily (and in light of this, recklessly) injected into entire populations, with children next, by governments, under coercion. And in all this remember how Pfizer has already been shown by a whistle blower employee to have had one sub-contractor manipulating trial data in at least 2% of their trials (but what of the rest of the trials? Again, perhaps we find out in 55 years).

 

And there’s worse news from Pfizer’s Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorisation Adverse Events Records Reports, regarding the range of adverse reactions that the company knew of from its vaccine. Note I’ve put a link to the document itself in references so you can read for yourselves – I wish Ardern and co would - but Dr. Guy Hatchard again (6A):

 

‘A document released by Pfizer as a result of a Freedom Of Information court order in the USA reveals a vast array of previously unknown vaccine adverse effects compiled from official sources around the world. Pfizer concedes this is ‘a large increase’ in adverse event reports and that even this huge volume is under-reported. Over 100+ diseases are listed, many very serious. This document was compiled by Pfizer in the very early days of the vaccine rollout in NZ but was possibly not supplied to our government.

 

[Snip]

 

Anyone reading the new Pfizer adverse event report compilation will be staggered. The sheer density of the technical medical terms and disease names are nevertheless broken down into recognisable and serious categories of illness—kidney failure, stroke, cardiac events, pregnancy complications, inflammation, neurological disease, autoimmune failure, paralysis, liver failure, blood disorders, skin disease, musculoskeletal problems, arthritis, respiratory disease, DVT, blood clots, vascular disease, haemorrhage, loss of sight, Bell’s palsy, and epilepsy.’

 

None of this is acceptable. Where is the media in investigating this? I can tell you where our media is: they’re signed up to the government’s 90% vaccinate campaign, and the $55 million government media fund (on the proviso they push ‘partnership’ with Iwi, and what else?) and run their own so-called fact checkers rubbishing anything counter to ‘Pfizer is safe’.  Our media sees itself only as the propaganda arm of the Labour government.

 

Then add to all of the above the fact that the technology in the mRNA vaccines has been around since the 1980s, they are in a sense well known, you may have even heard that in defence of these C19 vaccines, but the technology has never been passed for human use before C19 as it has not been able in any use to get over the safety barriers: the only reason it is being mass injected now is because there is a pandemic, governments have all panicked, and the vaccines have been given emergency roll out authorisation short cutting the trialling and safety testing. That doesn’t fill me with confidence. The reason I was initially hesitant on Pfizer, was the stopping of the long term trial, thus no data on any adverse long term effects of the vaccine, and this for a virus with a 99.7% survival rate, which thus seemed reckless and out of all proportion to me, and still does. I am yet to be convinced that Pfizer is either effective – in fact other than for symptoms, it’s definitely not that - or safe, and it’s certainly not tested.

 

All of which has led me to my position: because Pfizer in absolute terms merely betters my chances of surviving C19 by 0.74% over remaining unvaccinated, read that again, by only 0.74% (that is the much touted and rather mischievous 95% ‘relative’ efficacy * see addendum 1 at end of this post on what I mean by this, you’ll find it interesting) I don’t believe that slim improvement compensates for the short term risks for myself of six monthly shots of Pfizer – or worse, possibly three monthly shots - when every booster will be playing Russian Roulette with my heart, in the form of myocarditis or pericarditis (albeit noting deaths and harm from these two seems mainly to affect young men below 30 years of age, and pericarditis in 99% of cases is survivable, whereas myocarditis is serious: one third die, one third battle with poor health all their lives, one third will heal over a long period of time). I now have one ‘sudden death’ instance within my purview, a person I knew, and a surprising number of possible adverse effects from bad to transitory, which fall into the spectrum of such events – I don’t know whether it was a vaccine death, or the adverse symptoms were related to the vaccine, only that a thorough system concerned with safety would see every death, at least, after vaccination, investigated [see doctor video below], especially sudden deaths pertaining to the heart and clotting, but there is nothing, no system at all, to the point of  negligence, only self-reporting by the adversely affected.  Then excluding the short term risk up to two months from each vaccination, there are the unknown long term possible adverse effects such as maintained by those whom I shall refer to as the cancelled doctors, including possible damage to the immune system, jab by jab taking out T-cells you need to fight all the other ailments from the common cold to the cancers (Dr. Ryan Cole, pathologist, who runs the biggest independent testing laboratory in Idaho, has recorded a 20 times increase in cancers since that state started vaccinating, particularly melanomas), and of course the now well-known definite causes of death from blood clotting in the lungs and the brain, and future heart, circulatory (including hypertension), stroke and internal organ issues from possible micro-clotting caused by the spike protein and it’s progress through the capillaries of the bloodstream and filters of your internal organs which, if they eventuate, will take two to six years to express themselves [sic Dr. Hoffe, Canada]. Add to this list neurological disorders such as uncontrolled shaking, gut disorders, skin disorders from rashes to much worse, as well as antibody dependent enhancement has not been discounted with these vaccines either (where the antibody made by the vaccine instead of helping the body with immunity to the virus allows it entry to the body and facilities it on re-infections (note the Israeli health-workers case cited in the last case I’ve put in the reference section)). And then add to this again all of the 'extra' adverse reactions now indicated by the (above) release of the Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorisation Adverse Events Records Reports. It’s important to say that according to Pfizer’s/Reuters ‘fact’-checkers’, both Dr. Ryan Cole and Dr. Hoffe are cancelled and basically silenced now with constant attacks on their reputations: of course they are. However, regarding those fact checkers, I’ve put a link up in references (7) to the shoddiness of them: they are chiefly about promoting the governments demand that you must vaccinate – the only goddamned policy they have: I no longer believe fact-checkers are about Truth or the facts, as the referenced article shows, many of them are written by people with no experience at all in the areas they are ‘fact checking’ against qualified medical professionals with years of experience and publishing histories prior to C19. Albeit, again, I will say, for balance, I have seen none of those silenced doctors claims regarding T-cell loss, micro-clotting, etc followed up on in research to prove or disprove them, which we might after expected by now: but that in itself is cause for concern. They are doctors. They were speaking of their experiences and data with their patients. How hard is it to do follow up research so there is transparency and publish that research? Instead we just get infantile fact checkers telling us from authority to ignore them. Well for that reason I won’t. Although, happily, there is still medical science and research going on, some of the corpus of it I believe backing up the theories and experiences of these doctors, but you won’t find it ever informing government policy, and I really don’t think ‘those’ health advisors of our government are keeping up – or want to know anything outside a one size fits all vaccination policy with Pfizer’s – some are calling it Fizzers - leaky vaccine.

[Postscript added 31/12/2021: Dr. Hoffe mentioned above regarding micro-clotting in his patients has just posted to Bichute on vaccine injuries - permanent injuries from the micro-clotting - and his admonition to not vaccinate healthy children: well worth watching (separate window will open). ]

 

Regarding impairment of the body’s immunity to all other disease, including the cancers, there is a study out on how the spike protein impairs DNA damage repair (8):

 

Mechanistically, we found that the spike protein localizes in the nucleus and inhibits DNA damage repair by impeding key DNA repair protein BRCA1 and 53BP1 recruitment to the damage site. Our findings reveal a potential molecular mechanism by which the spike protein might impede adaptive immunity and underscore the potential side effects of full-length spike-based vaccines.’

 

 At the time of writing this Israel, again, highly vaccinated and one of first countries to do so, moving beyond it's fourth booster, is entering its fifth wave of C19 infection and consequent lock-downs of the population. I don't understand why governments are not questioning why the most vaccinated countries are getting the biggest infections (I know why Pfizer and Moderna aren't as they use every wave to promote a booster), when in South Africa, only 25% vaccinated, their hospital wards are emptying out under Omicron, and their doctors are confused about why Northern Hemisphere governments are locking their populations down for Christmas. I simply note that some immunologists question whether these COVID-19 mRNA injectable products are causing, yes, causing, immune system dysregulation - and not just in the context of the adaptive system, but in the context of the innate system. Note these immunologists are saying until more is known - via proper long term trails, which have not happened - why would any country be mass injecting children who have little to fear from C19 (I'll come back to this below). If you follow that link, the writer immunologist Dr. Jessica Rose gives a detailed breakdown of her concerns regarding our immune systems, ending with this:

'Since children have extraordinary capabilities with regards to dealing with COVID-19 via their innate immune system responses, what will happen to them if these are not only by-passed by these injections, but knocked down by them?'

 

 Here goes Dr. Jessica Rose interviewed on the vaccines and issues with the immune system including re-emergence of cancers - cancers are very much an issue of immune systems - and (confirmation of my first paragraph regarding Pauline) a warning for imuno-compromised people not to take the C19 vaccines, etc - Sorry, I can't embed the video, you have to follow the link:

Dr. Jessica Rose: vaccines a ticking time bomb for immune systems.

But the bulk of the issues - shorter term anyway -  are around clotting, coronary and circulatory issues. On the clotting issue there may finally be an answer found at least for why the AstraZeneca vaccine has led many unfortunate vaccinated to this tragic end (9):

 

‘Scientists believe they may have found the “trigger” behind the rare blood clot complications stemming from the AstraZeneca Covid-19 vaccine.

 

According to an international team of researchers from Cardiff and the US, the reaction can be traced to the way the adenovirus used in the vaccine to shuttle the coronavirus’ genetic material into cells binds with a specific protein in the blood, known as platelet factor 4 (PF4).

 

Researchers think this may spark a chain reaction in the immune system which can culminate in the development of blood clots — a condition known as vaccine-induced immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia (VITT).

 

Concerns about rare blood clots had an impact on how the company’s vaccine was used around the world, with alternatives offered to people aged under-40 in some countries.

 

On one hand this is good as once you find the problems you can fix them to make a better vaccine, but on the other side of the coin, seriously, they only find this after up to 85% to 90% of the population of the developed world has been to all extents mandatorily vaccinated with the unsafe vaccine? How many people died because of this issue with AZ? And all the time, people were being vaccinated with this while their governments and medical bureaucrats were telling them ‘don’t worry, these vaccines are safe’. That’s not good enough: and wonder what they’re still going to find out with Pfizer with its lack of long term testing also.

 

Moving to coronary and circulatory adverse reactions, which appear to be the majority of adverse reactions - the study below published over November 2021 carries a warning as to the recorded short term heart related deaths – Acute Coronary Syndrome - in the weeks following a vaccination, particularly the second inoculation (10):

 

Our group has been using the PLUS Cardiac Test (GD Biosciences, Inc, Irvine, CA) a clinically validated measurement of multiple protein biomarkers which generates a score predicting the 5 yr risk (percentage chance) of a new Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS). [Snip.] At the time of this report, these changes persist for at least 2.5 months post second dose of vac. We conclude that the mRNA vaccines dramatically increase inflammation on the endothelium and T cell infiltration of cardiac muscle and may account for the observations of increased thrombosis, cardiomyopathy, and other vascular events following vaccination.’

 

More on increased risk of heart attacks (inflammation of the heart - myocarditis) from the C19 vaccines on GB News with this below interview with cardiologist Dr. Assem Malhotra; the research firm cited demonstrating increased risk of heart attack following a nRMA vaccine shot, via the whistle-blower employee, will not publish their data because they are scared of losing their funding - listen:

 

Note, over the last week, and here we go again already, a ‘fact-checker’ on social media has been casting doubt on this doctor and the study he relies on in this interview. So again, make your own mind up, although I have heard Dr. Malhotra’s rebuttal to this in an interview (6 December 2021) and he destroyed – you’ll have to take my word for it – the fact-checker nonsense, and for the record Malhotra is a highly qualified and experienced, reputable cardiologist and the fact that most people will believe the fact-checkers, or worse Ardern, over his word is, well, depressing; but do you get the feeling there is an information war going on? An information war where transparency is non-existent. Consider further that regarding these issues around heart attacks and Pfizer, the also cancelled Dr. Peter McCullough, Canada, cites the following as the mechanism - I’ve copied and pasted it to a Word document, but lost the reference for this one sorry - quote: ‘Now there's pre-clinical studies suggesting the lipid nanoparticles [in the vaccines] actually go right into the heart. The heart expresses the spike protein and the body attacks the heart.’ My own understanding is this explains why fit young men seem most prone to myocarditis following vaccination as the stronger the immune system, ironically, the stronger the bodies attack on the victim’s own heart.

 

Dr. Aseem Malhotra again on a huge spike in cardiac attendances in Scotland through summer of  500 ambulance calls per week above normal to mainly age 15 to 64 year olds, which after settling down started up again over October 2021:



Ex-footballer Matt Le Tissier wonders why footballers and other sportspeople are suffering from so many heart problems in a manner he's never seen, and why he is vilified as an anti-vaxxer for asking an investigation into it? 

Click on this to watch in another screen, sorry I can't embed on the page.

 

If you’re curious, you don’t have to look far for evidence for this closer to home, but you will not ever hear it from Adern’s government or Mr Bloomfield, nor reported by our media; you have to go investigate for yourself (risking all of the nuttier rabbit-holes you can fall down here). To give just one example. The below is a tweet from Ben Madgen: Ben is a professional basketball player, he lives in Sydney, he plays for the South East Melbourne Phoenix, his is a blue tick Twitter account meaning it’s a verified account, that is, it IS Ben Madgen, and he posted this on Sunday 5 December 2021:

 


Remembering pericarditis is up to 99% recoverable over time, unlike myocarditis, although it can obviously end a sports career where you have to be at your peak for performance, that tweet is in a timeline followed by tweet after tweet of people telling of their heart issues, and their teens heart issues since particularly their second Pfizer inoculation. You may well also be interested in Ben's (another, New Zealand Ben, not Ben Madgen) story of pericarditis & clotting after his first Pfizer inoculation in New Zealand. Still not convinced? Let's move to the Manawatu:

 


I’ve read in a New Zealand social media site’s comments, but from anonymous posters that cannot therefore be verified, that at least three of our hospitals have wards that are dealing with these coronary issues: I’ve tweeted to our three main news sites to investigate as to whether this is true, but I get back only silence. They’re not interested. But I know that if this is happening with Pfizer in Australia, we have the same product here, it absolutely is happening here. How can it not be? Ardern’s government particularly can never let the public know this because they are now pushing the soon to start Pfizer – Fizzer – vaccination program for 5 to 11 year olds. I’ll leave it there other than to say if a child, teen or young man gets myocarditis they have a big problem – again, one third die, one third battle the condition all their lives, one third will heal, slowly - when all these young men – and women also - will in general have a much better than my 99.9887% (rounded that 99.9%) chance of no issues if they get C19. Indeed, for some perspective we have totally lost in everything to do with C19, thanks to that damned 1pm podium and the fear campaign to make us all vaccinate being run from it - citing Dr. Aseem Malhotra, the chance of a child in this age group dying of C19 is one in a million; compare that to the chance of dying from the flu, pre C19, which was one in three hundred thousand. For me, there is nothing right here about any of this, starting with the misinformation out of government and health bureaucrats, which is a reckless path to take with a governed population. And the crux of this issue thus falls on what has been missed, and deliberately obfuscated by governments: informed consent, which I get to next.

 

Not only is some good medical science still being conducted, even if it does not form policy due to Pfizer’s unholy hold over governments – for whatever reason in their secret contracts taking all liability from Pfizer, with safety data we don’t get to see for 55 years - there are also some 64 brave doctors in New Zealand who call themselves Doctors Speaking out with Science and whom have gone about their jobs ethically: although most of them have now lost their GP positions by this stage – think about that; doctors prepared to lose their livelihoods for them to remain, in their eyes, ethical. I suspect there may well be more doctors than this, but to stand out is to lose your reputation and your job, thus an ability to earn money to keep your family. Note these New Zealand doctors are not this ludicrous construct created and demonised in our media: the anti-vaxxer. They were all prepared to inoculate their patients with Pfizer. Their starting point was an issue basic to medicine that when taking a vaccine or any medical procedure, there must be informed consent: you sit one on one with your doctor, you go through your individual circumstances, including your medical history, your probability of even having an issue if you get C19, because for the majority it really will be just a flu, then you weigh this against the benefits and risks of the vaccine or procedure. Their point was there is little informed consent with these mass vaccination programs and a vaccine with no long term trial safety data: if you’ve learned a lot of new things even from reading this, then you took Pfizer without your informed consent. And that was the harm with governments breaking that doctor/patient relationship and brutally enforcing a one-size fits all vaccination program with mass jabbing centres from people with scant training just sticking needles in people’s arms. After you’ve read this post I urge you to listen to the two doctors in the below video, start with Dr. Shelton who is the second, especially on concerns around this all out push for a faulty vaccine over treatments that exist already (but Pfizer – I surmise - can’t monetise so they can’t be offered nor imported by those of us who have got ourselves informed?):

[Note added 14 December 2021: I've been told the below video is no longer up. I have no idea why the original is taken down, it was simply two New Zealand doctors debating (disagreeing with) our Covid policy: as I have said we are in an information war, and the State in New Zealand seems to have an unholy amount of power in shutting down what it sees as thought-crimes against their narrative. I'll leave the broken link below as an object lesson in how cancelling works. So far, at least, all the overseas links are still up.

Update: I note from the TV3 six o'clock news tonight, 14 Dec, that Dr Shelton, who was in this clip, has had his medical practicing certificate revoked, and faces a hearing with the NZMA for holding anti-government, sorry anti-Pfizer views, and for wanting a treatment based regime instead. Don't go thinking you live in a free country in New Zealand.

Indeed, here's the story.]

 


Furthermore, in the UK, Dr. Clare Craig, interviewed on the following clip by GB News, speaks of the concern she has of a high number of sudden deaths from coronaries and circulatory issues trending in the UK of particularly the young, and in their homes, because of course what Ben Madgen talks about above in Australia is also happening in the UK. Have a listen, take from that what you will. Dr. Craig is calling for an investigation on what is going on with this phenomena: I suspect there won’t be one:

 


While reading this piece, are you getting even a little suspicious of the line government and the health bureaucrats are feeding us? That you are being managed? Consider this: I think they are already laying the ground for the excuses they need to try and sweep future and long term C19 vaccination deaths and adverse life-long health issues from clotting, coronary and circulatory issues, gut disorders, etc, under the carpet: this is how stupid our governments and the pharmaceutical industry think you are. Worth a big quotation from the source, this published 5 December, 2021 (11):

 

Up to 300,000 people in the UK are facing heart-related illnesses due to post-pandemic stress disorder (PPSD), two London physicians have warned.

 

This could result in a 4.5 per cent rise in cardiovascular cases nationally because of the effects of PPSD, with those aged between 30 to 45 most at-risk, they claim.

 

Mark Rayner, a former senior NHS psychological therapist and founder of EASE Wellbeing CIC, said that as many as three million people in Britain are already suffering from PPSD, thanks to stress and anxiety caused by the effects of Covid-19.

 

He fears this could result in a dramatic rise in physical health issues, such as coronary heart failure, if cases are not detected or treated early.

 

Mr Rayner said: “PPSD is a very real problem on a massive scale. As well as the condition itself with all its immediate problems, one of the biggest collateral issues is the affect it can have on heart health.’

 

So there you go: I’d call that an awfully convenient way to deflect any and every coming death on a ‘massive scale’ from any possibility such deaths might be related by a medical establishment we must trust, apparently, to a poorly designed vaccine known to kill people, especially young men and then in that 30 to 45 year age group, from inflammation of the heart – myocarditis – or related coronary and circulatory issues soon after vaccination. The longer term deaths from that same process will be down to PPSD – stress.  

 

Or, perhaps the future deaths will be down to a spell of cold weather (12):

 

‘Researchers Warn That Cold Weather Can Cause Blood Clots & Heart Attacks:

 

As the cold winter weather arrives in the UK , forecasters issue weather warnings across the country, however, the cold weather can also have an impact your health according to researchers.

 

They warn that during the cold weather people are more likely to suffer from serious conditions such as heart attacks or blood clots.’

 

… heart attacks and blood clots no less. Cold weather. Perhaps they’re right, and that last source is admittedly a bit dodgy, and stress is certainly a factor in some heart attacks, but I don’t remember reading a preponderance of such articles before centred on and normalising coronary and clotting health issues permeating the media pre the C19 pandemic and vaccination programs. Call me suspicious again, but of course an alternative narrative has to be created.

 

And albeit, Pfizer may well be fine, I hope it is in earnest as so much is now riding on it being so, and the other C19 vaccines – no, I don’t think Moderna, now banned in at least six countries for under 30 year olds as that had simply too many myocarditis deaths in that age group recorded not be ‘noticed’ by the public in the countries it was used - but there is a scenario in which, just as many who catch C19 will have to deal with the lifelong health issues of long-Covid, so many of the vaccinated may end up with lifelong issues from the vaccines which will express itself in possibly similar ways, at least, there is not enough evidence to refute that proposition, and for myself, given the above I think it a rational decision to wait until such long term data is in, given my chances against C19 are, again, 99.9887%, which is damned good odds, and given once I take that shot my immune system is changed forever, that’s what vaccines do, I can never un-take it, I’ll have the spike in my bloodstream, and I’ll join you all as an annualised pin cushion to fill Pfizers treasury every year. By not taking the vaccine I still, also, give myself the chance to dodge C19 – and that damned spike protein - altogether until the virus largely blows itself out, which it will do, and there is some evidence to suggest it is already doing so via the corrupted C19 virus in Japan now that doesn’t seem to be able to copy itself, and the new B.1.1.529 Omicron variant that is more infectious than Delta, and governments are panicking over again and shutting down travel, but still, at time of writing this, seems very mild as to symptoms, and no recorded deaths yet. If so, spread the damned thing around the world. As viruses try to become more infectious they all do so at the cost of virulence: that is how the Spanish Flu after WW I finally was ended as a human menance.

 

One last point: when you debate this topic, you will be told – after everyone tells you to believe the government, Wiles, mad-modeller Hendy and Baker or you’re a conspiracy peddling nutjob - that the Pfizer jab remains in the deltoid muscle of your arm for a couple of weeks to create the immune response and that’s it. Okay, but then to anyone who tells you that, ask them to explain a single case of recorded death by myocarditis (and there are many and a growing number of cases), or a recorded death by blood clots in the brain. That spike protein evidently is in your bloodstream from the get go, and it obviously – deaths by blood clots in the brain – breaches the brain/blood barrier. At least that’s what my logical brains concludes.

 

Regarding the mandates and the covid passports to keep Pauline and I out of society as our punishment for not obeying our increasingly brutal and totalitarian Masters in Wellington and their demand that we be jabbed and jabbed and jabbed again on that historically bloodied altar of the ‘common good’, despite as stated Pauline can’t afford to get C19 so in an ironic way the passports barring us from restaurants, cafes and most inconveniently, my barber, do us a favour, as well as being philosophically repugnant, the mandates - which have seen so many lose their livelihoods, have seen suicides on that, domestic violence – and the passes are pointless, because transmission is little or not affected between vaccinated and un-vaccinated as I hope I have shown, if nothing else. And because these vaccines are harmful to many people, fact, they must not be mandatory, and they must not ever, as Austria has just legislated, be forced on every individual regardless of their circumstances – in Austria every citizen must by law be vaccinated by February 2022. Some of these people will die from the vaccines, and in this case, they will be state murders. The premise of this paragraph restated, in the words of C19 vaccine-injured Kyle Warner, former professional mountain biker in the US who believes he has lost his athletic career due to pericarditis from his second Pfizer inoculation, ‘where there is demonstrable risk, there must be choice’ of taking this vaccine or not [and therefore no government coercion].

 

World governments have lost their moral compass over Covid, including Ardern’s government: much of what they are doing is unconscionable. I can’t view Jacinda Ardern, Grant Robertson, and Christoper Hipkins as anything other than irresponsible thugs right now, playing with people’s livelihoods (and lives). Every job lost under our mandates is criminal.

 

Following from above I think it noteworthy that Ardern’s original premise for bringing in employer mandates and C19 passes (which look very much like digital identification papers to me) was to ‘save’ the selfless vaccinated from the selfish unvaccinated, that’s why we unvaccinated had to be demonised as we have been. However, on 1 December she did a complete about face, remembering she was supposed to be the ‘kind’ government, she switched this to saying we are still the (fatuous) team of five million – no we’re not - and the passes are (now) about saving the vulnerable unvaccinated from the vaccinated: God help me, so I’m to be excluded from living a normal human social life and can’t get a haircut, and that’s the government caring for me. But there’s a lot packed in this turnaround. Firstly, on that changed basis she just destroyed the original premise for mandates and passes, and she seems blithely unaware of that (because she’s making up policy day by day as she goes). Secondly, I think you’ll find that most unvaccinated people are very good at managing risk, and have rationally decided they don’t need to risk a poorly designed transient vaccine to save them from a virus they have on average a 99.7% probability of living through (for most it will be a bad cold), and this group does not want nannying by the state. We’re over this kind and caringly brutal government and want to be left alone, responsible for ourselves: that’s called a free country. Plus if I’m not allowed to partake in society, I’m having trouble seeing why I shouldn’t be giving myself an 80% income tax rebate?

 

That is my position. I realise – ego talking – if or when Pauline gets C19, and if the worst happens, I will be a ‘monster’ within the government narrative on vaccination, and the holier-than-thou on social media hoping one of us does die as an object lesson in foolishness – because people are awful - but I – and Pauline – are using our rational minds to find the course that fits ourselves by the science, not this dreadful fear mongering vaccine campaign run by Ardern’s government and her propaganda arm, Stuff, NZ Herald, RNZ and TVNZ, while she continues to ban the treatments that work for C19 if taken in the first seven days. So be it. I have an A+ average across three tertiary degrees, with first class honours, plus the same number of medical degrees as Bill Gates, Jacinda Ardern and Chris Hipkins (none): I am not a stupid man. Pauline can be a principled idiot, but she is no fool, (although she doesn’t bear fools like this government well).

 

Finally, this bit for our friends, somehow Ardern’s government has managed to make intelligent people fear unvaccinated people, despite transmission is the same – read everything I’ve written above - and when they are supposedly the safely vaccinated. They believe their vaccine won’t work unless I have the same vaccine that doesn’t work, and I’m therefore selfish not having the vaccine that doesn’t work. Hilarious, but anyway, for our friends, when Delta hits the South Island, so long as you don’t have symptoms, you’re welcome to come and drink or break bread with us, but we shall not be putting ourselves on you, nor will we be going to road events as under the Traffic Lights, that will make those events against the law (or possibly it will, I don't know, that damn system makes me so angry I choose not to have to think about it, albeit I'm forced to live it). We will not put our friends in uncomfortable and compromised positions: that’s not how friends work. We’re happy down here in our remote little part of paradise: Pauline, I, and Daisy dog. We can do that for some years if needs be.

 

For the rest of you out there in Gulag New Zealand, I repeat, where there is risk, and these C19 vaccines do contain risk, you bet they do, then there must be choice – noting the C19 vaccines are only so-called by dint of government’s changing the definition of what a vaccine is, because they are not a vaccine in the traditional sense of stopping you getting C19, transmitting C19, or dying of it. But yes, they do help you with the symptoms when you contract C19. That aside, many people have not taken the C19 vaccines to create the spike protein coursing through their capillaries and filters of their internal organs, for rational reasons, never forgetting that the principle of body autonomy free of the State, the right to choose what you put into your body, is in itself a good enough reason: remember that well when you talk of we unvaccinated in disparaging and spiteful terms from your own ignorance, accusing us of being luddites, or selfish, God help me, for my personal observation is, the first effects of Pfizer was to turn too many of you into fearful, know-it-all, do-as-I-say, authoritarian, arses. [Smiley face.]

 

Thank you for listening to my defence. Yours in the small freedoms we have been allowed left (which are not a lot).

 

No, one more thing. Somehow important: this is not easy; I’m not much enjoying life right now. I sleep fitfully. I wake with self-doubt, always. I’m worried about Pauline; she goes into C19 with less than no defence. I’m having to think about this all the time. I trust no one in power right now or those dreadful vaccine-fixated advisors to the exclusion of truth on the safety of these vaccines, and any responsible look at treatments. I have trouble concentrating on work, I’m shedding clients (deliberately), this week I plan to resign from my professional body, the thought of wasted hours of continuing education next year is too much; I only need to keep up with the concerns of my remaining client base, I really don’t need to know about NZ-Singaporean double tax agreement. Ardern’s government has made as big a dogs breakfast of tax legislation as C19, and I just can’t be bothered: work is depressing from the time I get to my desk each day, only relieved by the six o’clock glass of wine. Everything is hard and will be a nightmare for us under the Traffic Lights policy, from the fact I suspect I saw my mother, in care with dementia, for the last time about a month ago, and my sisters are now unfairly tasked with her management, and right down to we have a little dog going lame, and the vet practices are moving, unethically, to C19 passports by the look of it so getting treatment for her is set to become a cruel and circuitous route. Heaven help us if we have to make that final decision over the next two or three years: what, I have to give Daisy to some masked gimp in a carpark so they can take her off to kill scared and alone? Will they even euthanise her if it comes to that? Dentists, likewise, I’ve already read of horror stories from the North Island of people not being able to get emergency treatment, even if they do a negative test (and never forgetting the science: vaccinated and unvaccinated both get C19, both transmit it, both carry the same viral load, they are no different in a dentist’s chair): the Traffic Lights policy is inhuman, inhumane, unnecessary and evil. … All of this is against the science. Ardern, Robertson and Hipkins know this, but are determined to punish those that do not follow their will like the petty tyrants that they are. Well, they can go to hell. And you see, there, also is the problem. If you wanted Pauline to ever take Pfizer you could not have gone about this worse than this government’s policy of removing freedoms from her until she succumbs: she won’t. She would prefer to die of Covid first, and yes, she might. Thuggery is never an answer for anything, certainly not from government.

 

I keep asking myself why is government (here and worldwide) so determined on this reckless path of mass vaccinations with experimental, ultimately poorly designed – by any standard - transient vaccines that are neither effective, safe for many, or anywhere near fully tested? On that one you can go down the conspiracy rabbit hole, which the use of digital ID’s now feed into directly – the notion of the great reset: and I’m not going to discount that one at the end of the day because what is happening is all too strange. However, there is precedent of this simply being down to first panic by politicians as they got to grips with what C19 was, then incompetence, and finally covering their butts: once you’ve vaccinated half of your population it wouldn’t go well for your political career, or your peace of mind, to then start doubting that course, would it, before you even then start factoring in legal liability for adverse reactions and deaths. To borrow a notion from Dr Guy Hatchard (13) – already mentioned above - during WWI it early on became apparent that trench warfare was an unmitigated disaster as strategy, which led to the pointless deaths of millions of young men, yet its continued use kept being promoted by an establishment too stupid or too proud or too incompetent to consider anything else. They just kept feeding obedient young men into the killing fields and couldn’t change course. What saddens me, however, is that whole populations, today,  continue to take what they’ve been fed by politicians I wouldn’t trust walking Daisy dog, and certainly not walking in a straight and truthful line, without thinking or questioning, and just put Pfizer into their arms trusting everything they’ve been told is the truth, when it is not. Instead of herd immunity I’m afraid humans once again have not learned a damned thing and we’ve ended with a null-minded cruel and dangerous herd mentality.

 

Anyway, that’s it, but you’ll find the next bit edifying I hope (and yes, I realise this piece has become a bit disjointed, but I think it still makes sense).

 

 

* Addendum 1: That 95% Pfizer Efficacy Figure: Do you know what that figure means?

 

That Pfizer uses the line you have a 95% better chance surviving C19 with their vaccine is part of the course: it’s great marketing. That Ardern’s government and advisors, including that zealot Rod Jackson, and the socialist trinity (Wiles, modelling madman Hendy and Baker) use this term to brow beat the nation is something more mischievous. Like all such things, it is right, in a sense, but also, not, as you don’t have the full story until you understand what that figure means.

 

The 95% efficacy is a relative risk reduction ratio (RRR) not an absolute risk reduction (ARR). Easiest to show the significance of this by an example.

 

Take two groups: 21,830 people in the vaccinated group, 21,830 people in the unvaccinated group (who receive a saline solution – no one knows what group they are in). Actually I believe this was something like Pfizer’s original trial, the only to be published, as the figures are in my memory for a reason.

 

From this we get the result that 162 people in the unvaccinated group are hospitalised, 8 people in the vaccinated group hospitalised. So, 162 – 8 = 154 people avoided hospitalisation by being vaccinated: that’s the 95% efficacy (154 out of the 162). What it doesn’t tell you is 21,668 people, that’s 99.25% of the unvaccinated group, had nothing to worry about from C19. That’s why I said above, when you consider the entire group, the whole picture, in absolute terms taking Pfizer only improves my chances of not going to hospital by 0.74%. It is against that the risks of eternal vaccinations twice – or four times possibly - a year has to be judged against. And above I’ve given my answer for that: I’ll stay unvaccinated at least until I know the damage, or not, these vaccines are doing in ‘your’ systems over the long term. Thank you all for taking part in the long term trial. Note also that the only ones who therefore needed to be vaccinated were those 162 out of 21,830: we’ve closed down whole economies, destroyed civil liberties and handed a blank cheque of power to governments for that very small group: why has the concentration been on mass vaccinations with an experimental vaccine with therefore catastrophic consequences if it goes wrong, not just a targeted campaign at that 162, via their doctors? Surely that was the logical, prudent path to have taken. According to Yale epidemiologist, Dr. Harvey Risch, that was the better approach:

 “Overall, I’d say that we’ve had a pandemic of fear. And fear has affected almost everybody, whereas the infection has affected relatively few,” said Risch.

“By and large, it’s been a very selected pandemic, and predictable. It was very distinguished between young versus old, healthy versus chronic disease people. So we quickly learned who was at risk for the pandemic and who wasn’t.

“However, the fear was manufactured for everybody. And that’s what’s characterized the whole pandemic is that degree of fear and people’s response to the fear.”

Risch has authored more than 300 original peer-reviewed publications and was formerly a member of the board of editors for the American Journal of Epidemiology.

One more point on this: Pfizer's 95% RRR efficacy was from their phase three trial against the original strain of Covid, not against Delta. Ie against a virus that no longer exists. Such is the shoddiness of this entire process no government is asking Pfizer to repeat phase three tests against Delta so they're not. Israel which is exclusively using Pfizer estimate it's relative risk reduction against Delta is only around 40% efficacy. Now, put that into absolute terms and it's ludicrous for a healthy person to take the considerable risk of the vaccine for close to nil effect.

Is the mass campaign just to fill Pfizer’s treasury? And full credit to Pfizer, one of the most corrupt multi-nationals, look at their court room history, has beautifully played all these governments. Or is the more sinister great reset already mentioned in play here? I still balk at that last: I’m thinking a clever corrupt pharmaceutical industry and panicking not too bright politicians.

 

Because talking of clever corrupt pharmaceutical industry, that missing long term Pfizer trial data again. When Pfizer ran this trial it was based only on the initial jab, and the study only ran for a very short period of time, no time to find the long term consequences of the vaccine in the vaccinated group as opposed to the unvaccinated group. Most vaccines take a minimum of 7 years to bring to market and billions of dollars in safety research: Pfizer’s vaccine came to market in less than a year I believe, and has been brought to market for relatively little cost and with no legal liability on Pfizer if it goes wrong (under their contract with government). I notice they are now marketing many of their products that fix the better known adverse effects from their own Pfizer vaccine such as thrombosis; circa publishing this piece Pfizer has just purchased Arena Pharmaceuticals, a drug company specialising in cardiac machines and auto immune diseases: the directors and shareholders of Pfizer mustn’t be able to believe their luck. My biggest misgiving is not buying shares in the company four year ago. Anyway, the significant thing is once Pfizer got governments to issue its vaccine under emergency, with no liability of adverse effects, the company then thought it ‘unethical’ to leave the control group unvaccinated, and vaccinated them all. So any examination on the effects of the vaccine is now very difficult as there is no control group. Very ethical, or very convenient? We won’t know for 55 years.

 

Except there is a control group, isn’t there. It’s me, and we small and decreasing band of unvaccinated who have applied our minds and decided to wait or not be vaccinated with this first iteration of C19 vaccines. And I think that explains Austria’s appalling policy of mandatory vaccination, and Ardern’s government’s policy to exclude Pauline and I from civilised society, and so many from their jobs and livelihoods, from when those offensive traffic lights were switched on: is it to stop the back lash against them in future years if the data is not good regarding adverse effects over the group in the long term trial (you), by making sure the control group is vaccinated and no comparisons are possible?

 

Because by this stage I now understand all over again that governments are capable of every evil you can imagine.

 

Addendum 2: Try This Thought Experiment:

 

From time to time when you’re presenting your government Covid passport (digital identity papers) to buy that cup of coffee or sandwich from the café, ask the security person or staffer why you need to present your papers to buy a sandwich. It’s not about transmission of Covid: fully vaccinated people get Covid and transmit Covid as readily as the unvaccinated: so it’s not a medical passport. Therefore, why are you showing it?

 

It would be interesting to know if the businesses that are forced to comply with this, have any idea why they’re doing it.

 

Then add to that, I watched Andrew Little on the AM Show (30 November) tell the announcer that his government expects you all to scan C19 passports to prove full vaccination at your private events in your own houses, such as tea parties or Christmas, where you are not aware of the vaccination status of those attending. New Zealand has somehow reached a point where the government is directing you have to scan granny’s ID papers before she can come to Christmas dinner, or, if there is an outbreak, you will face a fine. At least that’s how I interpret his comments.

 

Which brings me to a final thought, therefore:

 

 

Addendum 3: Final Thought:

 

Pauline and I might be wrong in this: although as time and data go on, I am more and more convinced we are not. But if so, I’ve missed years of restaurant meals - and that will hurt - and inevitably we will be more and more isolated from our friends and families. Worst case Pauline’s dead. To face brutal facts, if she contracts C19 before it blows its virulence out. Albeit Pfizer may have brought that forward for Pauline, it has killed many people, and it may have made no difference anyway. However, if we are right, then we have dodged having to play Russian Roulette with our hearts and circulatory systems every six months, or will it be every three months, with the odds narrowing every booster as a heart can’t repair itself. And we have missed the possible shorter lives long term from nuking our immune systems over time, and all the future afflictions from micro-blood clotting.

 

Just to cheer you all up.

 

But forget all that. If nothing else, when put to the test, in the face of this brutal state bullying and scapegoating of the unvaccinated the likes of which none of us have seen in our lifetimes to conform to what politicians tell us to do on pain of very real penalties to even live a human life, and the demand that the majority, the vaccinated, somehow have a right to determine what we do or put into our bodies, in the face of that, Pauline and I have both said sod off. And although it looks like we are the pair who are restricted and unable to live full and social lives from this point, it was actually us, in the end, who chose free lives from a thug state, whether we’re right on the facts or not. We will never be proverbially checking granny’s ID papers before she could come and break bread with us. And it is you who are showing government mandated digital identification papers, just like in China, to buy a $4.50 cup of coffee. It’s going to get really interesting when you have to be quadruple vaxxed, wear full PPE, swear an affidavit, and pass a health science exam plus have a full body scan and internal investigation before you can order that coffee. And in the end we don’t reside, for now anyway, where the vaccinated do, which is that stifling prison of each other.

 

A quotation to end regarding government policy: who said this?

 

‘If a lie is big enough, and told often enough, people will believe it’.

 

And now if you're still with me, and want to see what I've written above reinforced by an expert vaccine maker, get a wine, take three hours out of your life an listen to this:

Professor Nikolai Petrosvsky: The Truth About Covid 19 Vaccines: 'I hope these mandates are illegal, or else there is nothing a government can't do. I don't want to live in a country where mandates don't prove unlawful.' But, also all the science on these mRNAs, injected into the public without animal testing or a long term safety profile:



 

[Update December 15, 2021. And gone. Unbelievable. The above video was extraordinary. Petrovsky is a vaccine maker in Australia whose firm had been involved in the creation of vaccines for some of the most 'infamous' viruses in our human history, including Ebola. After Pfizer and Moderna got to the Australian government his firm was shut out of all funding for a Covid vaccine, which his firm was well onto creating, but via the old, safe, technologies of burnt proteins. He is scathing of the corruption and lack of safety in the creation of the Covid mRNAs, that there were no animal trials, the vaccines have gone direct to humans under emergency powers in what he terms as the biggest medical experiment in human history. He is apoplectic that these unsafe vaccines are about to be injected into young children who face no real harm from Covid. ... That video lasted up for just over 72 hours before Authority had it taken down. 

I don't understand anything about what is happening  right now other than we are witnessing a state evil beyond my imagination. In 55 years time there better be a reckoning for all this, although for all of us, it will be too late.

If governments are so determined to destroy even the basic tenets of free speech and debate, to take information like this down, Petrovsky is one of the most educated medical 'geniuses' in the world right now, then our 'Masters' are hiding something all right. There is no other explanation. I won't touch these C19 vaccines. This silencing tells me everything I need to know, even though I can never fill in the gaps of the 'WHY'.

Note: for New Zealander's who know of Leighton Smith's podcasts on NewstalkZB, Petrovsky was interviewed on two of Leighton podcasts, if those still exist, I will put up links as soon as I am able.

Stop press: a reader has just sent me the below link to an audio version of this interview posted on a site off Youtube - note, Youtube is dreadful for censoring. The interview starts slow but it's worth it: I suggest you listen to it before that site is taken down. Regarding Petrovsky, here's his pedigree: ask yourself why social media would cancel what this man has to say:

 'Nikolai Petrovsky is Chairman and Research director of Vaxine Pty Ltd, an Adelaide-based biotechnology company focused on vaccine development, together with being a Professor of Medicine at Flinders University and Director of Endocrinology at Flinders Medical Centre. Over the last 16 years he has been principal investigator on five NIH vaccine grants totaling over 50 million dollars, with a focus on development of vaccine adjuvants and pandemic vaccine platforms. He has authored over 200 research papers and has won prestigious awards including 2010 Ernst & Young Entrepreneur of the Year Award. His current focus is development of the Covax-19 vaccine against COVID-19.'

You can listen to the whole interview here: 

]

 

 

 

References:

 

(1)

 

Some Autoimmune – ME/CFS - should be exempted from vaccination:

https://www.rnz.co.nz/news/national/456598/expert-says-chronic-fatigue-sufferers-should-be-exempt-from-covid-19-vaccination

 

(2)

 

Shedding of Infectious SARS-CoV-2 Despite Vaccination: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.07.31.21261387v4.full.pdf

 

And paraphrasing at: https://aaronsiri.substack.com/p/study-destroys-justification-for

 

(3)

 

Israeli C19 Airport study:

https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3963606

 

(4)

 

Transmission potential of vaccinated and unvaccinated persons infected with the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant in a federal prison, July—August 2021: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.11.12.21265796v1

 

(5)

 

Open letter to Jacinda re: Methodological flaw in Covid data collection, by Dr. Guy Hatchard:

https://www.oliviapierson.org/blog/open-letter-to-jacinda-re-methodological-flaw-in-covid-data-collection

 

(6)

 

Natural Immunity to C19:

https://www.biznews.com/health/2021/08/16/pre-existing-immunity

 

(6A)

 

Pfizer Post-Authorisation Information Revealed – Implications for Public Policy

https://www.thedailyexaminer.co.nz/pfizer-post-authorisation-information-revealed-implications-for-public-policy/

 

Also Pfizer’s Cumulative Analysis of Post-Authorisation Adverse Events Records Reports (So you can read it yourself):

https://phmpt.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/11/5.3.6-postmarketing-experience.pdf

 

(7)

 

Be wary of those fact-checkers:

https://brownstone.org/articles/misinformation-and-the-ministry-of-truth-testimony-to-u-s-house-of-representatives-select-subcommittee-on-the-coronavirus-crisis/

 

Quote: The Ministry of Truth is not all-knowing, and they are often checking items where the science itself is unsettled. Fact check organizations commonly employ people with no relevant background to conduct checks of scientific claims made by reputable scientists and scientific papers. They typically have limited expertise, relying instead on appeals to authority but without a capacity to sift between competing authorities.’ 

 

(8)

 

SARS-CoV-2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34696485/

 

(9)

 

Scientists believe ‘trigger’ for rare blood clots after AZ vaccine found:

https://www.irishtimes.com/news/health/scientists-believe-trigger-for-rare-blood-clots-after-az-vaccine-found-1.4744820

 

(10)

 

Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning: https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712

 

(11)

 

People facing heart-related illnesses due to post-pandemic stress disorder, warn physicians:

https://www.standard.co.uk/news/health/post-pandemic-stress-disorder-heart-conditions-covid-london-physicians-b969436.html

 

(12)

 

Researchers Warn That Cold Weather Can Cause Blood Clots & Heart Attacks:

https://newspunch.com/researchers-warn-that-cold-weather-can-cause-blood-clots-heart-attacks/

 

(13)

 

Jacinda Ardern, Science, and Covid Mandates, Events, Facts, and Fallacies.

https://planetb-media.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Guy-Hatchard-The-Long-Read-Jacinda-Dec-2021.pdf

 

 

Random References:

 

[Anecdotal] Dying COVID-19 Patient Recovers After Court Orders Hospital To Administer Ivermectin: https://www.zerohedge.com/covid-19/dying-covid-19-patient-recovers-after-court-orders-hospital-administer-ivermectin?utm_source=&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=318

An elderly COVID-19 patient has recovered after a court order allowed him to be treated with ivermectin, despite objections from the hospital in which he was staying, according to the family’s attorney

After an Illinois hospital insisted on administering expensive remdesivir to the patient and the treatment failed, his life was saved after a court ordered that an outside medical doctor be allowed to use the inexpensive ivermectin to treat him, over the hospital’s strenuous objections.’

 

Finally, I’ll include one more study I’ve not mentioned in above, but it’s stunning: I’ll provide link, but read the abstract below (8): https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanepe/article/PIIS2666-7762(21)00258-1/fulltext?s=08#%20

Quote: ‘High COVID-19 vaccination rates were expected to reduce transmission of SARS-CoV-2 in populations by reducing the number of possible sources for transmission and thereby to reduce the burden of COVID-19 disease. Recent data, however, indicate that the epidemiological relevance of COVID-19 vaccinated individuals is increasing. In the UK it was described that secondary attack rates among household contacts exposed to fully vaccinated index cases was similar to household contacts exposed to unvaccinated index cases (25% for vaccinated vs 23% for unvaccinated). 12 of 31 infections in fully vaccinated household contacts (39%) arose from fully vaccinated epidemiologically linked index cases. Peak viral load did not differ by vaccination status or variant type . In Germany, the rate of symptomatic COVID-19 cases among the fully vaccinated (“breakthrough infections”) is reported weekly since 21. July 2021 and was 16.9% at that time among patients of 60 years and older. This proportion is increasing week by week and was 58.9% on 27. October 2021 providing clear evidence of the increasing relevance of the fully vaccinated as a possible source of transmission. A similar situation was described for the UK. Between week 39 and 42, a total of 100,000 COVID-19 cases were reported among citizens of 60 years or older. 89,821 occurred among the fully vaccinated (89.7%), 3,395 among the unvaccinated (3.4%). One week before, the COVID-19 case rate per 100,000 was higher among the subgroup of the vaccinated compared to the subgroup of the unvaccinated in all age groups of 30 years or more. In Israel a nosocomial outbreak was reported involving 16 healthcare workers, 23 exposed patients and two family members. The source was a fully vaccinated COVID-19 patient. The vaccination rate was 96.2% among all exposed individuals (151 healthcare workers and 97 patients). Fourteen fully vaccinated patients became severely ill or died, the two unvaccinated patients developed mild disease. The US Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) identifies four of the top five counties with the highest percentage of fully vaccinated population (99.9–84.3%) as “high” transmission counties. Many decisionmakers assume that the vaccinated can be excluded as a source of transmission. It appears to be grossly negligent to ignore the vaccinated population as a possible and relevant source of transmission when deciding about public health control measures.

 



 

 

Comments

  1. Thanks Mark for a clear and concise article. I'm sitting here in Central Otago missing out and the local dining out, but happy in my choice. What you have succinctly written above aligns with my own feeling about the whole business, so thanks for putting my thoughts into words.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks for that Paul. Time will tell, or not, who is right and wrong. But with the report on TV3 news last night that there are 20,000 Omicron cases in South Africa daily now, but their Covid hospital wards are emptying out as the symptoms are so mild, and the cross to a New Zealand health official who said to be fully vaccinated the New Zealand jabbed had to have their booster (Pfizer number three) and then another booster coming to protect from Omicron, because, quoting 'we have to vaccinate against mild disease', I'm happy not to be that pin cushion: no you don't vaccinate with an unsafe, poorly designed product to stop mild disease, that's why we have immune systems. They've gone mad.

      Also, I read this morning that it won't be 76 years for FDA to release their safety data on Pfizer, as I said above; it's more likely to be 96 years.

      Delete
    2. Very well researched and presented. I believe we share very similar values and views on the nearly unbelievable events happening in NZ and worldwide.

      I tried to email you through the link on your blog, but was unsuccessful. Can you give me an updated email?

      Thanks mate, rich

      Delete
    3. Hi Richard. Thanks for this. Yes, old blog email will be way out of date. Best email to use for this will be markhubbardltd@gmail.com.

      Delete
  2. Good personal write-up.

    If I may critique one point please. You are correct to question whether the reported relative risk actually matters in the real-world. However, your understanding of absolute risk has one significant flaw, in that you have neglected to mention that absolute risk is a "one-off" risk. It is not - it is bound to the trial period only. In the case of the Phase 3 trial, I believe (I would need to confirm these details) that risk was bound to within the 7-days of the 2nd dose. In the case of COVID-19, absolute risk does not drop to zero once this period ends. Therefore, you need to add 0.74% for each week of absolute risk. Therefore, over a year = 38% absolute risk. Of course, this assumes level of community transmission stays stable, which is not likely. Whereas, a relative risk is well, always relative! It relates the risk across two groups (in this case, full vaxxed, vs unvaxxed). It does not mean you are 95% protected though!

    I think science communication has let us down collectively over many many years, and the pandemic has highlighted this more than ever. There is a real lack of understanding on many of the most-widely terms used, including relative risk. So, I thank you for identifying this. But, I'd suggest you reevaluate your description of the pros and cons of these terms in addendum 1.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't know what you're talking about with your 38% Dobbo. That makes no sense. And I couldn't care less about arguing such pedantic issues :) . The point is the only people who got the 95% efficacy with Pfizer against the first strain of Covid, and as stated, that figure doesn't even relate to Delta, were that group of 162 people who would otherwise be hospitalised: for that group, and sadly my wife Pauline is in that camp, the risk of Covid outweighs the vaccine, so they should choose to vaccinate with the safest of these unsafe vaccines (which at this stage is probably Pfizer). However, for the rest, that's over 99% they were not going to end in hospital anyway, thus taking the risk of these particular vaccines is, frankly, stupid. That's my take away, and what a shoddily deceptive figure the 95% relative efficacy is as being used by government and Pfizer. Esp when you factor in after six months or less the vaccines are useless anyway, because they're not really a vaccine. Thanks for the comment.

      Delete
  3. This deserves a much wider audience. Incredibly well written. Mark, you've done NZ a great service by going through your and Pauline's reasons with such depth and thoughtfulness.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm very familiar with the facts you present Mark, and so am driving for an hour and a half to rendezvous with one of my nearest and dearest for a picnic tomorrow, before he and his wife emigrate to Mexico next week - as a result of the way they feel over all that you have so eloquently explained.

    As he says, as an un-vaccinated person, like you and Pauline, ( he and his wife have health issues) he can go to petrol stations, supermarkets and pharmacies, and nowhere else... like so much going on in the world today, it seems a tangled web of pros and cons, and no 'give'.

    Another of my dearest ones studied with Sioux Wiles and then worked with her on a research project to try to discover new antibiotics, so you can imagine the family split ...

    I never even have a flu jab, but in deference to family members with asthma and other health issue I've had the famous jab, feeling that at 84, it doesn't really matter how I go, or if I'm poisoning my system...

    Having survived being sprayed with 245T in a farming community ( and being very ill for years), what with parabens, plastic pollution, pesticides, insecticides, etc etc in everything I put into my body already, what does one more noxious substance matter at this point in my life!
    Nil desperandum .... and back to Gandalf !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. LOL. Thanks Valerie.

      Your nearest and dearest moving to Mexico is interesting (why?)

      We live with lovely views, and property, but are seriously thinking of moving to Cornwall: a lot depends on Pauline's health.

      All a work in progress. ... In the meantime, I'd just love to be able to go to a pub or restaurant again (indeed, the Friday night men's shed down the road which put a passport on ... actually, don't know if I want to go back when this nonsense ends, we'll see.

      Re yourself, you should've have the jab: I'm assuming you're in the age groups where the risk of the vax certainly did compensate against the risk of Alpha through Delta (I think the risk of Omicron is quite a different calculation).

      Mind, Pauline should have had the jab also with her issues (or, the more studies I'm reading latterly, perhaps not as I think there are long term immune issues for the vaccinated.

      Would all be interesting if it wasn't such a great big mess.

      Delete
    2. Sorry, I mean as in why Mexico in particular?

      Delete
    3. Oh yes, had the jab, the people nearest me have such serious health issues...
      Mexico... lots of reasons, - Google San Miguel d'Allende - sounds lovely - good climate, lots of expatriates speaking English ! - cost of living about a third of what it is here, heavenly architecture... beautiful houses .... if I was twenty years younger, I'd love the adventure !

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Those Daily Lists of the Covid Hospitalised: How Many Are Hospitalised BECAUSE of Covid.